Edgewood Projects Progress, But More Planning Needed

by John Weckerle

In this week’s edition of The Independent, Edgewood Mayor Bob Stearley updates us on the status of a number of Town projects. We have a few thoughts on what we read in The Independent.

First, we’d like to suggest that the Town post these status reports on its web site rather than relying exclusively on the local newspapers to distribute the information.  That way, it would be easier to peruse the information at later dates.  This should be a relatively simple task.

With respect to content, we note that Mr. Stearley had already reported the completion of the sign ordinance (see our March 27 article) in a Guest View in the Mountainview Telegraph. Most of the other projects discussed are in the planning stage.  We are glad to see that the Town now has a full complement of police officers.  The sewer presents an interesting challenge: the latest update is that construction is anticipated to take 180 days – and there were only 190 days left in the year as of the date of Mr. Stearley’s letter to The Independent (Mr. Stearley had previously indicated that the sewer would be completed this year).  That leaves little leeway for delays.  We have not heard yet whether rates had been set, an effort that was also underway in March.

One thing that was not mentioned, but that is perhaps as important as the other issues, is development of a 40-year water plan for the Town of Edgewood, and initiative that Mr. Stearley supports.  Most communities in the area, especially those that own water systems, are developing such plans.  While not strictly  required, it seems logical that the Town should identify the resources available for growth and development.  We understand that people on both sides of the “development fence” are uneasy about the prospect; those for growth are concerned that the findings could result in limitations on growth, while those against growth are concerned that the findings could provide justification for it.  Setting aside the pursuit of specific agendas such as these, we consider it important that we know what we are getting into one way or another.  Having information on the future availability of water may be the first step in configuring community development to be in reasonable harmony with its environmental setting.  If the Town is willing to investigate a green energy future, then it should also be willing to consider water resources issues in its planning.  For this reason, we support Mayor Stearley’s position that the Town should prepare a 40-year water plan.

5 Responses “Edgewood Projects Progress, But More Planning Needed”

  1. Brad Hill says:

    Just a comment on status reports being put on the Town web site, what the Mayor submits to the newspaper is the Mayors opinion or perspective. These are not always consistent with the Council’s perspective, therefore it could be problematic for the Town web site being used as the Mayor’s forum as it may not necessarily reflect the official Town policy or accurately indicate action taken. For there to be a Town status report made public it would have to be approved by council. I will discuss with council to see if there is interest in doing this.
    Bard Hill, Councilor

  2. John Weckerle says:

    We applaud Mr. Hill for his willingness to approach the Council on this issue. Having an official status report (or reports) would be useful to many interested parties, and would help avoid the potential confusion that may arise from relying on a single person’s opinion.

  3. Melissa Ramirez says:

    I and my mother live at Edgewood for 8 years.I would enjoy Edgewood to grow,we are in need of a fitness center,resturants , a public park with a pool , walking path,& washateria.

  4. Melissa Ramirez says:

    I Melissa Ramirez been in a car accident of Dec.2004 and I feel Edgewood lacks things for our daily life.

  5. John Weckerle says:

    I agree, Melissa; many of the local people would like to see a fitness center and the other amenities you list. There are some walking paths, but we could use more. I’d like to see a more extensive walking/running/bike path system, as well.

Let us talk about
Name and Mail are required
Join the discuss

I'm not a robot (enter numbers) *